|
Message-ID: <ZrOc_0GKG8j6kDf5@itl-email>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 12:12:32 -0400
From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@...isiblethingslab.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: feedback requested regarding deprecation of TLS
1.0/1.1
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 09:18:28AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:44 AM Chad Sheridan <chadapsheridan@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > As a sysadmin, I welcome all of the changes. As far as warnings/alerts, I
> > can safely say, most of our clients don't read them anyway.
> >
> > > Can those machines be put behind a proxy?
> >
> > As for this, of course they can, but some clients will be tied up with so
> > much red tape and budgetary BS that it's a solution that isn't feasible in
> > a reasonable time frame.
>
> ++. Medical devices certified 10 or 15 years ago won't be able to
> pivot as quickly as most people would like. And as I understand
> things, the certifications for medical equipment can be lengthier and
> more expensive than NIST's Cryptographic Module Validation Program.
>
> (It's somewhat amazing how often Windows CE and Windows Mobile crop up
> every now and again).
>
> Jeff
Why does this prevent using a proxy in front of the device? I mean
something like (patched) stunnel or another generic TLS reterminating
proxy, not something specific to the device.
--
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.