[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a73fa85204d307c3dedb81a34e019e83a2c417e.camel@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:54:12 +0000
From: "Singh, Balbir" <sblbir@...zon.com>
To: "ppandit@...hat.com" <ppandit@...hat.com>
CC: "matthew.sheets@...ms.com" <matthew.sheets@...ms.com>, "code@...icks.com"
<code@...icks.com>, "Mendoza-jonas, Samuel" <samjonas@...zon.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "oss-security@...ts.openwall.com"
<oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [test case][kunit] CVE-2020-10711 Kernel netLabel
On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 11:27 +0530, P J P wrote:
>
> Hello Balbir,
>
> +-- On Fri, 15 May 2020, Singh, Balbir wrote --+
> > I've spent some time writing a kunit test case for CVE-2020-10711 using the
> > KUNIT framework. I am attaching the patch below for reference. The patch is
> > against the latest linux-next. The details are in the test case, there
> > are some TODOs:
> >
> > 1. Add test cases for the ipv6 variant
> > 2. Add a test case for cipso_v4_parsetag_rpm variant
> >
> > Please feel to suggest improvements or better ways to test this, this is
> > a rough patch, but I still wanted to share it and see if it helps others/
> > get comments on the approach to testing it.
>
> Thank you so much for working on this. At first glance it looks okay, you need
> to send this to an upstream -netdev list for better reviews/inputs.
>
> -> http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#netdev
>
Thanks Prasad!
I was reaching out the security list to check if the patches were correct
from a security verification view point. I will get feedback from netdev
as well in a while
Balbir Singh.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
