[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.2005151113190.1451610@xnncv>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:27:06 +0530 (IST)
From: P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>
To: "Singh, Balbir" <sblbir@...zon.com>
cc: "oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>,
"matthew.sheets@...ms.com" <matthew.sheets@...ms.com>,
"code@...icks.com" <code@...icks.com>,
"Mendoza-jonas, Samuel" <samjonas@...zon.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [test case][kunit] CVE-2020-10711 Kernel netLabel
Hello Balbir,
+-- On Fri, 15 May 2020, Singh, Balbir wrote --+
| I've spent some time writing a kunit test case for CVE-2020-10711 using the
| KUNIT framework. I am attaching the patch below for reference. The patch is
| against the latest linux-next. The details are in the test case, there
| are some TODOs:
|
| 1. Add test cases for the ipv6 variant
| 2. Add a test case for cipso_v4_parsetag_rpm variant
|
| Please feel to suggest improvements or better ways to test this, this is
| a rough patch, but I still wanted to share it and see if it helps others/
| get comments on the approach to testing it.
Thank you so much for working on this. At first glance it looks okay, you need
to send this to an upstream -netdev list for better reviews/inputs.
-> http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#netdev
Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
8685 545E B54C 486B C6EB 271E E285 8B5A F050 DE8D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
