[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170316163421.GI759@scully.more-magic.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:34:21 +0100
From: Peter Bex <peter@...e-magic.net>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Adam Maris <amaris@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE request for unchecked size argument in
malloc() in CHICKEN Scheme
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:17:13PM +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Bex <peter@...e-magic.net> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Adam Maris wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> oss-security mailing is no longer a place for requesting CVEs. Please,
> >> request CVE from MITRE via https://cveform.mitre.org/ or also possibly
> >> from DWF project via http://iwantacve.org/
>
> > Oh yeah, I forgot about that. I've filled out the form, and I hope I've
> > done this correctly.
>
> Please don't forget to forward the form details to this list once a CVE
> has been assigned. Thanks.
This was assigned CVE-2017-6949. The form details were in my original
mail, but I'll include them here again, though I must say fiddling around
with e-mail to forward it is much much more inconvenient than how it used
to work:
> [Suggested description]
> An issue was discovered in CHICKEN Scheme through 4.12.0.
> When using a nonstandard CHICKEN-specific extension to allocate an
> SRFI-4 vector in unmanaged memory, the vector size would be used in
> unsanitised form as an argument to malloc(). With an unexpected size,
> the impact may have been a segfault or buffer overflow.
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Vulnerability Type]
> Buffer Overflow
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Affected Product Code Base]
> Affected: All versions up to and including 4.12.0. No fixed versions released yet
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Affected Component]
> All SRFI-4 vector constructor functions in CHICKEN Scheme
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Attack Type]
> Context-dependent
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Impact Code execution]
> true
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Impact Denial of Service]
> true
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Attack Vectors]
> When using a nonstandard CHICKEN-specific extension to allocate a
> SRFI-4 vector in unmanaged memory, the vector size would be used in
> unsanitised form as argument to malloc().
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Reference]
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2017-03/msg00000.html
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Has vendor confirmed or acknowledged the vulnerability?]
> true
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [Discoverer]
> Lemonboy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
