[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5543A8EB.9080307@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 04:25:15 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@...enet.co.nz>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: CVE-2015-3455 - SQUID-2015:1 Incorrect X509 server certificate validation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
__________________________________________________________________
Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2015:1
__________________________________________________________________
Advisory ID: SQUID-2015:1
Date: May 01, 2015
Summary: Incorrect X509 server certificate validation
Affected versions: Squid 3.2 -> 3.2.13
Squid 3.3 -> 3.3.13
Squid 3.4 -> 3.4.12
Squid 3.5 -> 3.5.3
Fixed in version: Squid 3.5.4, 3.4.13, 3.3.14, 3.2.14
__________________________________________________________________
http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2015_1.txt
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3455
__________________________________________________________________
Problem Description:
Squid configured with client-first SSL-bump does not correctly
validate X509 server certificate domain / hostname fields.
__________________________________________________________________
Severity:
The bug is important because it allows remote servers to bypass
client certificate validation. Some attackers may also be able
to use valid certificates for one domain signed by a global
Certificate Authority to abuse an unrelated domain.
However, the bug is exploitable only if you have configured
Squid to perform SSL Bumping with the "client-first" or "bump"
mode of operation.
Sites that do not use SSL-Bump are not vulnerable.
__________________________________________________________________
Updated Packages:
This bug is fixed by Squid version 3.5.4, 3.4.13, 3.3.14, and
3.2.14.
In addition, patches addressing this problem for stable releases
can be found in our patch archives:
Squid 3.2:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.2/changesets/squid-3.2-11836.pa
tch
Squid 3.3:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.3/changesets/squid-3.3-12690.pa
tch
Squid 3.4:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.4/changesets/squid-3.4-13222.pa
tch
Squid 3.5:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.5/changesets/squid-3.5-13817.pa
tch
If you are using a prepackaged version of Squid then please refer
to the package vendor for availability information on updated
packages.
__________________________________________________________________
Determining if your version is vulnerable:
All Squid-2.x, 3.0 and 3.1 are not vulnerable to the problem.
1) Run "squid -v" to determine if SSL support is enabled.
All Squid built without SSL support are not vulnerable to the
problem.
2) Run "squid -k parse 2>&1 | grep ssl_bump" to determine if
SSL-Bump is being used.
All Squid-3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5 operating with ssl_bump omitted
from squid.conf are not vulnerable to the problem.
All unpatched Squid-3.x operating with "ssl_bump client-first"
in squid.conf are vulnerable to the problem.
All unpatched Squid-3.x operating with "ssl_bump bump" in
squid.conf are vulnerable to the problem.
__________________________________________________________________
Workaround:
There is no workaround for Squid-3.2.
For Squid-3.3 and 3.4, upgrade the squid.conf settings to use
"ssl_bump server-first".
For Squid-3.5, upgrade the squid.conf settings to use a
"ssl_bump peek" operation before the "bump" operation.
NOTE that these workarounds do not resolve the vulnerability,
but allow Squid to relay (or mimic) the invalid certificate to
clients and depends on validation in the client.
Or,
Disable SSL-Bump. Which may be done in the following ways:
* Build Squid-3.2, 3.3, or 3.4 with ./configure --disable-ssl
* Build Squid-3.5 with ./configure --without-openssl
* Remove from squid.conf (and include'd files) any ssl_bump
directives.
__________________________________________________________________
Contact details for the Squid project:
For installation / upgrade support on binary packaged versions
of Squid: Your first point of contact should be your binary
package vendor.
If you install and build Squid from the original Squid sources
then the squid-users@...id-cache.org mailing list is your primary
support point. For subscription details see
http://www.squid-cache.org/Support/mailing-lists.html.
For reporting of non-security bugs in the latest release
the squid bugzilla database should be used
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/.
For reporting of security sensitive bugs send an email to the
squid-bugs@...id-cache.org mailing list. It's a closed list
(though anyone can post) and security related bug reports are
treated in confidence until the impact has been established.
__________________________________________________________________
Credits:
The vulnerability was discovered and reported by a contributor
who wishes to remain anonymous.
The vulnerability was fixed and tested by
Amos Jeffries, Treehouse Networks Ltd. and
Christos Tsantilas, The Measurement Factory.
__________________________________________________________________
Revision history:
2015-04-29 01:35 GMT Initial Report
2015-05-01 13:49 GMT CVE Assignment
2015-05-01 12:50 GMT Patches and Packages Released
__________________________________________________________________
END
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)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=/qom
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
