[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEsznC75pwsZfO4WpFiDCjqNXAA-y2C_S4yrrKci=7Rw6S8OSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:32:25 +0300
From: Lior Kaplan <kaplanlior@...il.com>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, "security@....net" <security@....net>
Subject: Re: CVE Request: PHP SoapClient's __call() type
confusion through unserialize()
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com> wrote:
> On 2015-03-30 23:42:01, Tomas Hoger wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 20:35:59 +0100 Andrea Palazzo wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to request a CVE for the PHP Sec Bug #69085.
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > SoapClient's __call() method is prone to a type confusion
> > > vulnerability which can be used to gain remote code execution through
> > > unsafe unserialize() calls.
> > >
> > > Info:
> > > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69085
> >
> > There is another unserialize issue fixed in 5.6.7, 5.5.23 and 5.4.39
> > and currently listed on PHP 5 Changelog page:
> >
> > http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php
> >
> > Fixed bug #68976 (Use After Free Vulnerability in unserialize()).
> (CVE-2015-0231)
> > https://bugs.php.net/68976
>
> I believe that the ChangeLog-5.php page contains a typo since NVD claims
> that CVE-2015-2787 corresponds to PHP bug #68976:
>
> https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-2787
>
>
We weren't aware of this CVE assignment... Thanks.
The bug & changelog updated.
Kaplan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
