[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150330224953.GC6329@boyd>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:49:54 -0500
From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: security@....net
Subject: Re: CVE Request: PHP SoapClient's __call() type
confusion through unserialize()
On 2015-03-30 23:42:01, Tomas Hoger wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 20:35:59 +0100 Andrea Palazzo wrote:
>
> > I'd like to request a CVE for the PHP Sec Bug #69085.
> >
> > Description:
> > SoapClient's __call() method is prone to a type confusion
> > vulnerability which can be used to gain remote code execution through
> > unsafe unserialize() calls.
> >
> > Info:
> > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69085
>
> There is another unserialize issue fixed in 5.6.7, 5.5.23 and 5.4.39
> and currently listed on PHP 5 Changelog page:
>
> http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php
>
> Fixed bug #68976 (Use After Free Vulnerability in unserialize()). (CVE-2015-0231)
> https://bugs.php.net/68976
I believe that the ChangeLog-5.php page contains a typo since NVD claims
that CVE-2015-2787 corresponds to PHP bug #68976:
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-2787
Tyler
>
> While this lists CVE, it's CVE that was assigned to an issue fixed in
> 5.6.5, 5.5.21 and 5.4.37:
>
> Fixed bug #68710 (Use After Free Vulnerability in PHP's unserialize()). (CVE-2015-0231)
> https://bugs.php.net/68710
>
> New id seems to be required for the new issue.
>
> --
> Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Product Security
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
