Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B8941D.5040101@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:31:25 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: cpio -- directory traversal

On 2015-01-16 06:09, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
>> cpio is susceptible to a directory traversal vulnerability via symlinks.
>
> This is not a bug.  It's doing exactly what you asked of it.

Could you please elaborate? Citing my email to upstream: 
"--no-absolute-filenames option seems to be intended to limit extracting 
contents of an archive to be strictly inside a current directory (it 
guards against both absolute paths and relative paths with .. in them). 
However it can be bypassed with symlinks [extracted from the archive]."

-- 
Alexander Cherepanov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.