[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFThDPGGtcAQHxy84Vg5JrF7KoTtcaMG8mE4DZbcq-cDcydXAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:21:36 -0700
From: Luca Carettoni <luca.carettoni@...isoft.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: Security advisory in Jenkins
Ironically, you could use OWASP Dependency-Check Jenkins plugin
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/OWASP+Dependency-Check+Plugin
As it uses NVD, CVE-2013-2186 is tracked.
Cheers,
Luca
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...suke.org> wrote:
> We are still learning how we should handle vulnerabilities, so I'm sure
> there's room for improvements.
>
> We have multiple release lines to which the fixes have to be released
> simultaneously, and overall this overhead is significant. That's why we did
> one massive release that contains all the fixes.
>
> Wrt CVE-2013-2186, a week ago we got a report from somebody that he did a
> security scan and found that we are still using a vulnerable version of the
> library to which CVE-2013-2186 is assigned. In this release we use a newer
> version of the library that addresses the problem, and I thought it'd be
> appropriate to raise a flag to the users that if they continue to use older
> versions, they'd remain vulnerable to CVE-2013-2186. That's why it's in the
> advisory. It is not because we sat on a report for more than a year.
>
> When you say the timeframe is especially concerning, perhaps you mean you
> are concerned that we fail to notice this vulnerability in our library for
> more than a year, and if so, you are of course right. Jenkins project has
> gotten a long list of library dependencies, and I haven't found any
> practical means to get notified when vulnerabilities are found in any one
> of them.
>
> 2014-10-01 19:11 GMT-07:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
>
> > Bryan - I think Kohsuke is not subscribed. I've added CC.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:36:59PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > > On 10/1/2014 6:25 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
> > > > I just wanted to share that the Jenkins project issued a security
> > advisory
> > > > today. These issues are independently found and we've aggregated
> into a
> > > > single release.
> > > >
> > > > The relevant CVE IDs, our bug tracking IDs are available here
> > > > <
> >
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security+Advisory+2014-10-01
> > >
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > The new versions can be downloaded from here
> > > > <http://mirrors.jenkins-ci.org/>.
> > > >
> > > > (This is the first time I do this, so my apologies in advance for
> > probably
> > > > failing to follow the expected format.)
> > >
> > > Kudos to all for finding and fixing these issues. It was quite a
> > > surprising list though. Were these fixes kept from release for an
> > > extended time? The timeframe for CVE-2013-2186 is especially
> concerning.
> >
> > Many of these issues were brought to the distros list on Fri Sep 26
> > 17:10:16 2014 UTC, and got their CVE IDs assigned there. However,
> > CVE-2013-2186 was not among those. I don't know why the old CVE ID,
> > nor how that issue was handled.
> >
> > Alexander
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
