|
Message-ID: <542F2082.6020502@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:17:38 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Shellshock timeline
On 10/03/2014 04:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/03/2014 01:28 PM, David A. Wheeler wrote:
>> FYI, I've created a timeline of major Shellshock events here:
>>
>> http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/shellshock.html#timeline
>>
>> If anyone has corrections or key additions, let me know.
In section 1.2, you mention that Florian suggested suffix additions; but
he was not alone in the suggestion; I also independently came up with
the idea (primarily because patch 25 included a change to a comment line
that mentioned the past attempt to use a suffix):
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-09/msg00094.html 24 Sep
2014 15:38:31 -0600
My arguments at the time were based more on namespace pollution
considerations (what happens when a function name and variable name
collide), and it wasn't until later that I learned that the oss-security
list was discussing ramifications of the fact that ANY parser bug is a
major hole if untrusted user data is unconditionally presented to the
parser, without regards to namespace pollution.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (540 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.