[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201403071530.s27FUQg0020637@linus.mitre.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:30:26 -0500 (EST)
From: cve-assign@...re.org
To: mancha1@...h.com
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request/Clarification - PHP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Two issues were recently identified as security concerns in
> libmagic: CVE-2014-1943 (infinite recursion flaw) &
> CVE-2014-2270 (improper bounds checking).
>
> What is the policy regarding CVE allocation for products
> vulnerable by virtue of bundling copies of vulnerable products
> (as opposed to, say, linking vulnerable system libraries)?
>
> I bring this up because PHP embeds a copy of libmagic
A CVE assignment for libmagic (in the file product) can be used by all
vendors who bundle libmagic. Different copies of libmagic in different
products do not have separate CVE IDs.
- --
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTGeW2AAoJEKllVAevmvmsPe8IAKbPUTbrekNSfAiGbJqu/wi4
iyastVoV0mdPbFw7zLBwkUHsFOWlijdwCZE2nCgqkKtz6qL9F8Qkc6bgpj4D+SvO
4y69akfMOqpGzXjJbB+VGMvhcszPAB5vehbbkEKg9ZO/OD+x0bVHzpbtv2O1eTIQ
BzM2syQ1/mr0cQTOn6ife6+8u5ljv0M+FvAS7xmBI9cUVe1aivXSPTXNOfCUpzwd
HX4JWMWV2d96gj/Rsf/AIZbkHwpWaeemh9IuisVaFYFcjDqo1S7Py1n0fcGgYhjB
Ak+E57lFo+KPHr1ytnoVpAQJFW7AD/Tf29v95MwmjD8H9QLDBR13TnBDRDn9J38=
=9fOg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
