[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <505165A2.7030100@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:48:34 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>,
"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Oracle Security Team <secalert_us@...cle.com>,
David Jorm <djorm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request (minor) -- JVM: heap memory disclosure
(possibly various JDKs)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2012 04:55 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> thank you for the clarification.
>
>> Jan/Kurt,
>>
>> The bug report appears to be describing a narrow class of
>> vulnerability that could affect multiple codebases that implement
>> Java Virtual Machines, not just Oracle's;
>
> That's true, my yesterday's request was too wide, because in that
> moment we were not sure yet, which concrete JVM implementations
> would be affected by this deficiency (and which not).
>
>> if so, then a separate CVE would be needed for each REPORTED
>> codebase, and CVE-2012-4416 is ONLY for bug id 7196857 for the
>> Oracle-supported JVM.
>
> Anyway, upon David's review (Cc-ed too) we can announce that this
> problem would affect / is specific only to Oracle Java SE 7
> (java-1.7.0-oracle), and Java SE 7 as provided by OpenJDK 7
> (java-1.7.0-openjdk).
>
> So after above suggestion we will use CVE-2012-4416 for Oracle's
> codebase / Oracle supported JVM and the OpenJDK one should obtain
> another CVE identifier.
>
> I will clarify this situation in our bugs too yet.
>
> Kurt, could you allocate another CVE id then for the OpenJDK part
> of the story?
>
>>
>> I wonder about the severity of the issue, but given the
>> possibility that applications might access an array before a
>> fill, and applications may depend on there being "empty" elements
>> after initialization, this seems reasonable for a CVE.
>
> Florian clarified on this already (why to assign CVE id for these
> is appropriate approach).
>
> Thank you && Regards, Jan. -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat
> Security Response Team
>
>>
>> - Steve
Please use CVE-2012-4420 for this issue in OpenJDK
- --
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/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=9fyV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
