|
Message-ID: <402506908.19649.1300223422042.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:10:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: David King <amigadave@...gadave.com>, Mark McLoughlin <mark@...net.ie>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org> Subject: Re: CVE Request / Discussion -- vino -- reports the desktop being reachable only over the local network, when reachable from everywhere ----- Original Message ----- > Hello Josh, Steve, David, vendors, > > this is due the following vino deficiency: > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553477#c0 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678846 > > As noted in [1] Vino may incorrectly report, that relevant user desktop > is reachable only over local network, when in fact it's reachable from > everywhere. > > As this is issue slightly on the border, not sure it should receive a CVE > identifier, so Cc-ed David Woodhouse to elaborate more on issue impact if > necessary. > > Under my opinion, the trust boundary is crossed (it is wrongly reported > to the the user, they have a secure setup, when they do not have it and > otherwise would perform steps to correct the settings). But left the > final decision for further discussion. > > What are the thoughts of the others? Should this one get a CVE identifier > or not? > > Upstream bug report: > [3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596190 > > Ubuntu bug report (IPv6 specific): > [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bug/344489 > The above bugs talk about two flaws. Based on discussions I'm giving them both CVE ids. Issue #1 Vino incorrectly tells users their desktop is only reachable over the local network. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596190 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bug/344489 Use CVE-2011-1164 Issue #2 Vino can open ports via uPnP without alerting the user. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678846 Use CVE-2011-1165 Thanks. -- JB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.