[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1103141755470.14482@faron.mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:09:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...-smtp.mitre.org>
To: oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...-smtp.mitre.org>,
David King <amigadave@...gadave.com>, Mark McLoughlin <mark@...net.ie>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: CVE Request / Discussion -- vino -- reports the desktop being
reachable only over the local network, when reachable from everywhere
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> this is due the following vino deficiency:
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553477#c0
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678846
>
> As noted in [1] Vino may incorrectly report, that relevant user desktop
> is reachable only over local network, when in fact it's reachable from
> everywhere.
>
> As this is issue slightly on the border, not sure it should receive a
> CVE identifier,
It should, for the reasons you gave:
> it is wrongly reported to the user, they have a secure setup, when they
> do not have it and otherwise would perform steps to correct the
> settings).
There are various precedents in CVE. For example, when a browser shows a
lock icon (or some other indicator of connection
confidentiality/integrity) when the connection isn't actually encrypted
(e.g. CVE-2010-3312, CVE-2009-1107).
Regarding UPnP warning for vino - it's a little more difficult to clearly
define when a product doesn't give "enough warning" to a user, but there
are precedents (e.g. CVE-2010-0497, CVE-2008-4234, CVE-2000-0277,
CVE-1999-1055).
FYI, people interested in security issues related to the UI could look at
CWE-445, CWE-357, and CWE-355 for starters. It doesn't seem like a very
well-explored area.
- Steve
> What are the thoughts of the others? Should this one get a CVE identifier or
> not?
>
> Upstream bug report:
> [3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596190
>
> Ubuntu bug report (IPv6 specific):
> [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bug/344489
>
> To David King -- David, what are the upstream plans for this issue? Is there
> by any
> chance upstream patch for the bug [3] yet?
>
> Thanks && Regards, Jan.
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
