[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090827100133.3e5ebaac@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:01:33 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: CVE id request: php5
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:20:14 -0500 (EST) "Steven M. Christey"
<coley@...us.mitre.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > If the script is taking untrusted input data and passing it
> > unsanitized as the "key" argument to a dba_replace() call, it can
> > override arbitrary keys in the ini file anyway. Truncating the ini
> > file to zero length seems like a less severe problem than being
> > able to write (arbitrary?) data to arbitrary keys.
>
> We don't have any formal criteria for this kind of thing, but in
> general, we ask whether there are realistic scenarios under which an
> attack can succeed, and if any additional privileges are gained
> versus normal methods. These questions are particularly applicable
> to language interpreters and compilers. Given this scenario, it
> seems unrealistic that an app would perform a dba_replace() with
> user-controlled input - and if it does, then it's a vuln in the
> application, not PHP itself. So it doesn't seem to require a CVE.
Just for posterity, this got CVE-2008-7068 after all.
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
