[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250301155407.GP1827@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 10:54:07 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
Cc: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: f128 aliases for long double math symbols
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 09:29:20AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Rich Felker:
>
> > In addition, if the functions were standardized, it would violate the
> > requirement of non-equality of function pointers for distinct
> > functions.
>
> Is there really such a requirement for functions that have distinct
> types?
There's a requirement for function pointer non-equality regardless of
types. Function pointers can all be cast and compared freely as long
as they're only *called* with the correct type matching the
definition, and different functions cannot compare equal.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
