|
Message-ID: <20180206174618.GB1220@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:46:18 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Bugs in strftime On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:51:24PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: > > This bug is causing these failures: > > > "%+3C": expected "+20", got "020" > > > "%+11F": expected "+2016-01-03", got "02016-01-03" > > > "%+5G": expected "+2015", got "02015" > > > "%+5Y": expected "+2016", got "02016" > > > "%+5Y": expected "+0000", got "00000" > > I'll need to look over how to change the logic to match the desired > behavior but it shouldn't be hard. Attaching a patch I intend to push if I don't find any problems, and the one I've already got queued up for the %F issue. Let me know if you see any issues with them. Rich View attachment "0001-fix-strftime-field-widths-with-F-format-and-zero-yea.patch" of type "text/plain" (1251 bytes) View attachment "0002-adjust-strftime-modifier-to-match-apparent-intent-of.patch" of type "text/plain" (2045 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.