[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180206173020.GA1220@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:30:20 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Bugs in strftime
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:10:02PM +0100, Dennis Wölfing wrote:
> On 05.02.2018 18:51, Rich Felker wrote:
> > I've actually discussed this before, being doubtful about whether the
> > current behavior was correct, but was unable to find any authoritative
> > interpretation. Do you know if there is one?
>
> Unfortunately I don't know of any.
OK, I guess the examples will have to suffice.
> I don't think that the standard explicitly defines what "field" means.
> However the standard also uses the term "minimum field width".
> It would be weird to interpret the text in a way that "minimum field
> width" refers to a different "field" than "the field being produced".
>
> > Thanks again for doing this testing and reporting it. Would you be
> > interested in helping get these tests into our libc-test package?
>
> Sure. What do I need to do for that?
The repo is here:
http://nsz.repo.hu/git/?p=libc-test
Patches for it are generally just sent to this list. Szabolcs Nagy is
the maintainer.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
