[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130410143120.GD20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:31:20 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: vfprintf.c:(.text+0xc6c): undefined reference to
`__signbitl'
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:14:44AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:47:54 +0200
> Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote:
>
> > although it's probably easier to just add -mlong-double=64
> > during the musl build
> >
> > the unsupported format can be detected in the configure
> > script (the user will have to use -mlong-double=64
> > consistently then though, but we can add it to the musl-gcc
> > wrapper as well)
>
> Are the gcc startup files sensitive to this?
> If not, this seems desireable (I would put it in the specs file, but that's a pretty trivial difference).
It should not affect them. We'd just need to add code to configure and
the Makefile to generate extra arch-specific stuff for addition into
the specfile..
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
