|
Message-ID: <51673C52.3020108@eservices.virginia.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:42:26 -0400 From: Zvi Gilboa <zg7s@...rvices.virginia.edu> To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: crypt_data: structure size in crypt.c vs. crypt.h Greetings, Looking at crypt.c and crypt.h, I was wondering whether having different-size /crypt_data/ structures was intentional, and if so, for what reason. At the moment, the declarations are (and see also the attached code): /<crypt.h>/ struct crypt_data { int initialized; char *__buf[256]*; }; /* 260 bytes when sizeof(int)==4 */ /<crypt.c>/ char *__crypt_r(const char *, const char *, *struct crypt_data **); char *crypt(const char *key, const char *salt) { static char *buf[128]*; return __crypt_r(key, salt, *(struct crypt_data *)buf*); /* when sizeof(int)==4, this leaves __buf with 124 bytes. */ } On that note: since the /initialized /member is (currently) never referenced by name, adding a comment about that to the code might help readers who are yet to be initiated:) Best regards, Zvi Content of type "text/html" skipped View attachment "crypt_data_struct_size.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (265 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.