|
Message-ID: <f7f08704-dc4b-c5f8-3889-0fb5957c9c86@intel.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:49:42 -0700 From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Cc: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>, Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@...zon.de>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.de>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets On 6/13/19 10:29 AM, Nadav Amit wrote: > Having said that, I am not too excited to deal with this issue. Do > people still care about x86/32-bit? No, not really. It's just fun to try to give history lessons about the good old days. ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.