Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVOzGCN+pjgsdd+x3APsrSGJzngfGeSWvqWy=XTQj3EiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:07:40 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/vsyscall: Document odd #PF's error code for vsyscalls

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 01:25:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >  tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c | 9 ++++++++-
>
> Did this hunk end up in the wrong patch? (It's not mentioned in the
> commit log and the next patch has other selftest changes...)
>

It was intentional -- you can run the improved selftest and observe
the oddity for yourself :)  I'll improve the changelog.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.