[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190613200535.GC18385@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:05:35 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@...zon.de>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM
secrets
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:49:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/13/19 10:29 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > Having said that, I am not too excited to deal with this issue. Do
> > people still care about x86/32-bit?
> No, not really.
Especially not for KVM, given the number of times 32-bit KVM has been
broken recently without anyone noticing for several kernel releases.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
