[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <969b6ea5-a5bf-70b7-7031-38b07538f744@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:46:02 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jonatan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf-security: document perf_events/Perf resource
control
On 11.02.2019 1:34, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> General note: Please stay in the 80 char limit for all of the text.
Yes, sure. [PATCH v2 4/4] implements wrapping at 72 columns.
>
>> +The perf_events system call API [2]_ allocates file descriptors for every configured
>> +PMU event. Open file descriptors are a per-process accountable resource governed
>> +by the RLIMIT_NOFILE [11]_ limit (ulimit -n), which is usually derived from the login
>> +shell process. When configuring Perf collection for a long list of events on a
>> +large server system, this limit can be easily hit preventing required monitoring
>> +configuration.
>
> I'd move this sentence into a different paragraph and keep those related to
> RLIMIT_NOFILE together.
Makes sense. Let's have these two paragraphs:
Open file descriptors
+++++++++++++++++++++
Memory allocation
+++++++++++++++++
>
>> ... RLIMIT_NOFILE limit can be increased on per-user basis modifying
>> +content of the limits.conf file [12]_ on some systems.
>
> On some systems?
Well, let's avoid this subtlety and have it like:
'RLIMIT_NOFILE limit can be increased on per-user basis
modifying content of the limits.conf file [12]_ .'
>
>> Ordinarily, a Perf sampling session
>> +(perf record) requires an amount of open perf_event file descriptors that is not
>> +less than a number of monitored events multiplied by a number of monitored CPUs.
>
> s/a number of/the number of/
Accepted.
>
> The ordinary use case is:
>
> perf CMD pile-of-events PROCESS
>
> which does not specify the monitored CPUs at all. Then the number of file
> descriptors is NR_EVENTS * NR_ONLINE_CPUS.
>
>> +An amount of memory available to user processes for capturing performance monitoring
>
> The amount ...
Accepted.
>
>> +data is governed by the perf_event_mlock_kb [2]_ setting. This perf_event specific
>> +resource setting defines overall per-cpu limits of memory allowed for mapping
>> +by the user processes to execute performance monitoring. The setting essentially
>> +extends the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK [11]_ limit, but only for memory regions mapped specially
>
> s/specially/specifically/
Accepted.
>
>> +for capturing monitored performance events and related data.
>> +
>> +For example, if a machine has eight cores and perf_event_mlock_kb limit is set
>> +to 516 KiB, then a user process is provided with 516 KiB * 8 = 4128 KiB of memory
>> +above the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit (ulimit -l) for perf_event mmap buffers. In particular,
>> +this means that, if the user wants to start two or more performance monitoring
>> +processes, the user is required to manually distribute available 4128 KiB between the
>
> distribute the available
Accepted.
>
>> +monitoring processes, for example, using the --mmap-pages Perf record mode option.
>> +Otherwise, the first started performance monitoring process allocates all available
>> +4128 KiB and the other processes will fail to proceed due to the lack of memory.
>> +
>> +RLIMIT_MEMLOCK and perf_event_mlock_kb resource costraints are ignored for
>
> constraints.
Accepted.
>
>> +processes with the CAP_IPC_LOCK capability. Thus, perf_events/Perf privileged users
>
> what means perf_events/Perf ?
'perf_events/Perf privileged users' refers to the paragraph about privileged users.
'perf_events/Perf' means exact combination of the kernel subsystem (perf_events) and
the privileged Perf tool (Perf) executable that enables certain group of users with
performance monitoring capabilities without scope limit.
>
>> +can be provided with memory above the constraints for perf_events/Perf performance
>> +monitoring purpose by providing the Perf executable with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
Thanks,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
