[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902102300210.8784@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 23:34:21 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Jonatan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf-security: document perf_events/Perf resource
control
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, Alexey Budankov wrote:
General note: Please stay in the 80 char limit for all of the text.
> +The perf_events system call API [2]_ allocates file descriptors for every configured
> +PMU event. Open file descriptors are a per-process accountable resource governed
> +by the RLIMIT_NOFILE [11]_ limit (ulimit -n), which is usually derived from the login
> +shell process. When configuring Perf collection for a long list of events on a
> +large server system, this limit can be easily hit preventing required monitoring
> +configuration.
I'd move this sentence into a different paragraph and keep those related to
RLIMIT_NOFILE together.
> ... RLIMIT_NOFILE limit can be increased on per-user basis modifying
> +content of the limits.conf file [12]_ on some systems.
On some systems?
> Ordinarily, a Perf sampling session
> +(perf record) requires an amount of open perf_event file descriptors that is not
> +less than a number of monitored events multiplied by a number of monitored CPUs.
s/a number of/the number of/
The ordinary use case is:
perf CMD pile-of-events PROCESS
which does not specify the monitored CPUs at all. Then the number of file
descriptors is NR_EVENTS * NR_ONLINE_CPUS.
> +An amount of memory available to user processes for capturing performance monitoring
The amount ...
> +data is governed by the perf_event_mlock_kb [2]_ setting. This perf_event specific
> +resource setting defines overall per-cpu limits of memory allowed for mapping
> +by the user processes to execute performance monitoring. The setting essentially
> +extends the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK [11]_ limit, but only for memory regions mapped specially
s/specially/specifically/
> +for capturing monitored performance events and related data.
> +
> +For example, if a machine has eight cores and perf_event_mlock_kb limit is set
> +to 516 KiB, then a user process is provided with 516 KiB * 8 = 4128 KiB of memory
> +above the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit (ulimit -l) for perf_event mmap buffers. In particular,
> +this means that, if the user wants to start two or more performance monitoring
> +processes, the user is required to manually distribute available 4128 KiB between the
distribute the available
> +monitoring processes, for example, using the --mmap-pages Perf record mode option.
> +Otherwise, the first started performance monitoring process allocates all available
> +4128 KiB and the other processes will fail to proceed due to the lack of memory.
> +
> +RLIMIT_MEMLOCK and perf_event_mlock_kb resource costraints are ignored for
constraints.
> +processes with the CAP_IPC_LOCK capability. Thus, perf_events/Perf privileged users
what means perf_events/Perf ?
> +can be provided with memory above the constraints for perf_events/Perf performance
> +monitoring purpose by providing the Perf executable with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
