[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170624091110.GX4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 10:11:11 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Qualys Security Advisory <qsa@...lys.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
Grzegorz Andrejczuk <grzegorz.andrejczuk@...el.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Use ELF_ET_DYN_BASE only for PIE
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:59:55PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This is v2 (to refresh the 5 patches in -mm) for moving ELF_ET_DYN_BASE
> safely lower. Changes are clarifications in the commit logs (suggested
> by mpe), a compat think-o fix for arm64 (thanks to Ard), and to add
> Rik and mpe's Acks.
>
> Quoting patch 1/5:
>
> The ELF_ET_DYN_BASE position was originally intended to keep loaders
> away from ET_EXEC binaries. (For example, running "/lib/ld-linux.so.2
> /bin/cat" might cause the subsequent load of /bin/cat into where the
> loader had been loaded.) With the advent of PIE (ET_DYN binaries with
> an INTERP Program Header), ELF_ET_DYN_BASE continued to be used since
> the kernel was only looking at ET_DYN. However, since ELF_ET_DYN_BASE
> is traditionally set at the top 1/3rd of the TASK_SIZE, a substantial
> portion of the address space is unused.
With existing kernels on ARM:
00010000-00017000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 270810 /bin/cat
00026000-00027000 r--p 00006000 08:01 270810 /bin/cat
00027000-00028000 rw-p 00007000 08:01 270810 /bin/cat
7f661000-7f679000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 281659 /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-2.23.so
7f688000-7f689000 r--p 00017000 08:01 281659 /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-2.23.so
7f689000-7f68a000 rw-p 00018000 08:01 281659 /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-2.23.so
If the loader is loaded at 4MB, this means the size of an ET_EXEC
program is limited to less than 4MB - and distros aren't yet
building everything as PIE on ARM.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
