[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58E7BA48.70903@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:11:52 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Roy Franz <rfranz@...ium.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ef/libstub: arm/arm64: randomize the base of the
UEFI rt services region
Hi Ard,
On 07/04/17 16:51, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> That is quite interesting, to be honest, because that patch should
> effectively be a NOP on systems that do not implement
> EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL.
>
> Could you run this from the UEFI shell please?
>
> http://people.linaro.org/~ard.biesheuvel/RngTest.efi
As you predicted:
Shell> RngTest.efi
UEFI RNG Protocol Testing :
----------------------------
-- Locate UEFI RNG Protocol : [Fail - Status = Not Found]
Error reported: Not Found
> I would expect it to report that it has no EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL
> implementation. Could you also check whether the working kernel still
> works /after/ having executed that utility?
The broken kernel remains broken after running that test. reboot. The working
kernel continues to work after running that test.
(On Monday) I will try with just these efi changes on v4.11-rc. to try and
eliminate everything else in linux-next.
This is one of those firmware versions that prints lots of
> efi: [Firmware Bug]: IRQ flags corrupted (0x00000140=>0x00000100) by EFI
get_variable
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
