[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FE3A54.4020102@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:07:32 +0100
From: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC: <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "Aaro
Koskinen" <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Alexander Sverdlin
<alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jaedon Shin
<jaedon.shin@...il.com>, Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>, Paul Burton
<paul.burton@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] MIPS: KASLR: Print relocation Information on
boot
On 01/04/16 09:44, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:38:10PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
>>> When debugging a relocated kernel, the addresses of the relocated
>>> symbols and the offset applied is essential information. If the kernel
>>> is compiled with debugging information, then print this information
>>> during bootup using the same function as the panic notifer.
>> Notifier.
> Fixed when merging.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2: None
>>>
>>> arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 9 +++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
>>> index d8376d7b3345..ae71f8d9b555 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
>>> @@ -477,9 +477,18 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
>>> */
>>> if (__pa_symbol(_text) > __pa_symbol(VMLINUX_LOAD_ADDRESS)) {
>>> unsigned long offset;
>>> + extern void show_kernel_relocation(const char *level);
>>>
>>> offset = __pa_symbol(_text) - __pa_symbol(VMLINUX_LOAD_ADDRESS);
>>> free_bootmem(__pa_symbol(VMLINUX_LOAD_ADDRESS), offset);
>>> +
>>> +#if (defined CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL) && (defined CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO)
>> Not #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO)?
>>
>> [...]
> CPP syntax is not what most people seem to believe that is the parenthesis
> around the argument of defined are not required so above line is unusual
> but perfectly ok. However following boring standards is good so I changed
> this, too.
>
> Ralf
Great, thanks Ralf.
Matt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
