[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANWtx01P28ivhisBwLZmrEAFX8-ecj7uVESCjkNUYswyHYOxkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:36:08 -0400
From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: *2john conversion support
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Shinnok <admin@...nnok.com> wrote:
> Does any of you incline towards using binaries done by Rich for inclusion in
> the redistributable? If they're self contained enough and working well that
> is, Rich?
I can get python into a standalone executable pretty well. Sometimes
ruby too, I've not made a perl (exe) binary in awhile, I assume it can
be done still. I love the *2john's that just compile into a native
binary best as I'm sure we all would.In the meantime I'm willing to
document my processes and to contribute redistributables.
-rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
