|
Message-ID: <CAHNEV5RSdA4KucEvGE=--7W2NDABaiEmQj4QavjP0gbg_DGEcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:05:37 -0400
From: Mathieu Laprise <mathlaprise@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: *2john conversion support
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Shinnok <admin@...nnok.com> wrote:
> > Does any of you incline towards using binaries done by Rich for
> inclusion in
> > the redistributable? If they're self contained enough and working well
> that
> > is, Rich?
> I can get python into a standalone executable pretty well. Sometimes
> ruby too, I've not made a perl (exe) binary in awhile, I assume it can
> be done still. I love the *2john's that just compile into a native
> binary best as I'm sure we all would.In the meantime I'm willing to
> document my processes and to contribute redistributables.
Hey Rich, did you make some progress on that ?
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.