[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adde370cc86773db408f90c1e336648a@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:13:06 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: NTLMv1 and MSCHAPv2
On 6 Feb, 2013, at 15:03 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:24:40PM +0100, magnum wrote:
>> Sure thing, somehow I misread what you wrote. This is now fixed, threshold is 100 c/r pairs and this is printed:
>>
>>
>> netntlm: Note: slow loading. For short runs, try netntlm-naive instead (using
>> --format=netntlm-naive). That version loads faster but runs slower.
>>
>>
>> MSCHAPv2 got the same fixes too.
>
> Great. Now should we adjust the format_name or algorithm_name for the
> naive formats to indicate that they're naive (and different from the
> newly sped up ones)? I think we should. Any specific suggestions?
I think we should use algorithm_name, as in [32/32 naive].
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
