|
Message-ID: <458adf6f66fdcbd61eef3f4b083add67@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:35:10 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: formats failing test on big-endian On 6 Feb, 2013, at 15:35 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > I built unstable-jumbo on debian_etch_sparc_small.qcow2 from > http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/ Emulating a Sparc on x86? Cool, we were just discussing that today. > For comparison, 1.7.9-jumbo-7 took 40 minutes. Looks like we've almost > doubled the amount of code, or at least complexity for the compiler. > > After fixing the [21] vs. [22] issue for the revised MSCHAPv2 and > NETNTLM formats, there are still plenty of formats failing tests - > although none are crashing the program anymore: > (...) I came up with the exact same list today, using a 15 years old Sparc 32 (it's probably slower than QEMU on a decent machine). But I got a segfault in VMS in line 525 of uaf_decode_plug.c. Could not find any reason for that. I actually feared worse results. I will fix some of them. The MSSQL, Office and RAR problems are in Unicode conversions, this is trivial. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.