|
Message-ID: <20120708215004.GA32342@openwall.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:50:04 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Atom: bf P1 asm results (was:Between 1.7.9-jumbo-3 and 1.7.9-jumbo-4 performance of --format=bf dropped by more than 20%) On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:32:14PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: > Without any changes: > > $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes --format=bf --test=10 > Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32 X2]... DONE > Raw: 169 c/s real, 169 c/s virtual > > Switching to ASM: > > $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes-asm --format=bf --test=10 > Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... DONE > Raw: 215 c/s real, 216 c/s virtual > > Switching to the P1 ASM version: > > $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes-asm-p1 --format=bf --test=10 > Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... DONE > Raw: 231 c/s real, 232 c/s virtual Thanks! To make this more specific, can you please post your /proc/cpuinfo? Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.