Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120708215004.GA32342@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:50:04 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Atom: bf P1 asm results (was:Between 1.7.9-jumbo-3 and 1.7.9-jumbo-4 performance of --format=bf dropped by more than 20%)

On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:32:14PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> Without any changes:
> 
> $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes --format=bf --test=10
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32 X2]... DONE
> Raw:	169 c/s real, 169 c/s virtual
> 
> Switching to ASM:
> 
> $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes-asm --format=bf --test=10
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... DONE
> Raw:	215 c/s real, 216 c/s virtual
> 
> Switching to the P1 ASM version:
> 
> $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes-asm-p1 --format=bf --test=10
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... DONE
> Raw:	231 c/s real, 232 c/s virtual

Thanks!  To make this more specific, can you please post your
/proc/cpuinfo?

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.