[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP686A7933F269A1D2405C37FDEC0@phx.gbl>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:59:03 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in dynamic format names
On 07/08/2012 12:23 PM, jfoug wrote:
>> From: Frank Dittrich [mailto:frank_dittrich@...mail.com]
>>
>> The other "problem" is that the built-in format names are printed with a
>> colon, whereas the user-specified aren't.
>> Should this be unified? If yes, which way?
>> If this gets unified, the benchmark-unify script needs to be adjusted as
>> well, but that is trivial.
>
> I will add the : char to the dynamic formats coming out of dynamic.conf (the
> dyna_1000 +)
Great. If your patch gets added to 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes, this one should
be applied as well, so that benchmark-unify converts benchmark test
output of previous john versions to the latest format (adding a colon
after dynamic_NNNN if there isn't one already).
Frank
View attachment "0001-benchmark-unify-make-sure-dynamic_NNNN-is-followed-b.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (716 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
