[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24e659f994c251835cf524bb2d1c04ef@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 18:58:44 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fix salt size of dynamic formats in --list=format-details
I can't work it out. Frank, you'll need to rebase this patch against
current 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes and repost.
I think I have committed everything except this one. Here is the latest
commits (newest at top) for 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes:
c6fa11c Fix dynamic_1010 format name (Frank Dittrich)
a8baf5e Optimized mscash2-opencl (Solar)
0a6a01b Fix sha1-per-key calculation (magnum)
a56ef07 RAdmin, SIP speedup (Solar)
...and here's magnum-jumbo:
c6fa11c Fix dynamic_1010 format name (Frank Dittrich)
0ddad9d JtR-Bleed-make-generic-unaligned.diff (JimF)
5b10569 JtR-bleed-align-macro-fix-1.diff (JimF)
a8baf5e Optimized mscash2-opencl (Solar)
0a6a01b Fix sha1-per-key calculation (magnum)
a56ef07 RAdmin, SIP speedup (Solar)
d20ca4e Integrate psk-crack (from ike-scan) into john. (Dhiru Kholia)
...and bleeding:
c6fa11c Fix dynamic_1010 format name (Frank Dittrich)
df797d1 JtR-Bleed-make-generic-fixes.diff (JimF)
0ddad9d JtR-Bleed-make-generic-unaligned.diff (JimF)
5b10569 JtR-bleed-align-macro-fix-1.diff (JimF)
a8baf5e Optimized mscash2-opencl (Solar)
0a6a01b Fix sha1-per-key calculation (magnum)
a56ef07 RAdmin, SIP speedup (Solar)
d20ca4e Integrate psk-crack (from ike-scan) into john. (Dhiru Kholia)
Is this correct? Should we not apply 5b10569 to 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes?
magnum
On 2012-07-08 17:20, jfoug@....net wrote:
> If the original change I made (to list=format-all-details is in jumbo-6-fix, then this change should go there also (along with all other more volatile trees)
>
> NOTE, I think there were some other diff code in the patch, you may need to take out first. Frank got differences which were not committed yet to git, that I had done prior.
>
> Jim.
>
> ---- magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-08 07:47, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>>> After the logic for the salt size of dynamic formats got changed (just 0
>>> or size of pointer), the output of --list=format-details needed to be
>>> changed in a similar way as --list=format-all-details had been changed.
>>
>> Where should this go? 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes? magnum-jumbo? bleeding?
>>
>> magnum
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
