[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP262296BAF6093C84AA1B885FDEC0@phx.gbl>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 19:02:32 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fix salt size of dynamic formats in --list=format-details
On 07/08/2012 04:54 PM, magnum wrote:
> On 2012-07-08 07:47, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>> After the logic for the salt size of dynamic formats got changed (just 0
>> or size of pointer), the output of --list=format-details needed to be
>> changed in a similar way as --list=format-all-details had been changed.
>
> Where should this go? 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes? magnum-jumbo? bleeding?
That patch should go into the trash bin, because it accidentally
contained some unrelated changes.
Please apply this one instead to bleeding-jumbo, magnum-jumbo and
1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes. (Jim's fix for the failed self tests I got for some
dynamic formats with reversed pw.dic changed the usage of salts, the
--list=format-all-details got adjusted to that change, but not
--list=format-details.)
Frank
View attachment "0001-Fix-salt-size-of-dynamic-formats-in-list-format-deta.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
