[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120708112046.4YEPW.452733.imail@eastrmwml303>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:20:46 -0400
From: <jfoug@....net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fix salt size of dynamic formats in
--list=format-details
If the original change I made (to list=format-all-details is in jumbo-6-fix, then this change should go there also (along with all other more volatile trees)
NOTE, I think there were some other diff code in the patch, you may need to take out first. Frank got differences which were not committed yet to git, that I had done prior.
Jim.
---- magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-07-08 07:47, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> > After the logic for the salt size of dynamic formats got changed (just 0
> > or size of pointer), the output of --list=format-details needed to be
> > changed in a similar way as --list=format-all-details had been changed.
>
> Where should this go? 1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes? magnum-jumbo? bleeding?
>
> magnum
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
