[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBB24C2.9030601@hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:11:30 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenMP for MD5-crypt
2011-11-09 20:45, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:29:06PM +0100, magnum wrote:
>> 2011-11-09 13:39, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> With these two changes, I think the check could be:
>>>
>>> #if !defined(MD5_in_sse_intrinsics) && defined(__GNUC__) && \
>>> (__GNUC__ < 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 4)) && \
>>> !defined(_OPENMP) && !defined(USING_ICC_S_FILE)
>>> #undef MD5_SSE_PARA
>>> #endif
>>
>> Sounds reasonable. So if I understand correctly, the above check would
>> replace the current one in MD5_std.h and there is no other things needed
>> anywhere, right?
>
> Yes, that's my understanding too.
This was incorporated in patch 0004.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
