[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111109194522.GA20156@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:45:22 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenMP for MD5-crypt
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:29:06PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> 2011-11-09 13:39, Solar Designer wrote:
> > With these two changes, I think the check could be:
> >
> > #if !defined(MD5_in_sse_intrinsics) && defined(__GNUC__) && \
> > (__GNUC__ < 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 4)) && \
> > !defined(_OPENMP) && !defined(USING_ICC_S_FILE)
> > #undef MD5_SSE_PARA
> > #endif
>
> Sounds reasonable. So if I understand correctly, the above check would
> replace the current one in MD5_std.h and there is no other things needed
> anywhere, right?
Yes, that's my understanding too.
> Oh, but hopefully we're not that far from a j1, right?
I hope so too.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
