Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBB268F.3080003@hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:19:11 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: more targets using sse-intrinsics.S

2011-11-09 22:57, magnum wrote:
> 2011-11-09 18:47, magnum wrote:
>> 2. Should we support this for 32-bit at all? I suppose I can cross
>> compile a 32-bit .S file with icc (haven't tried it) but I have no idea
>> if it will perform better or worse than gcc on a 32-bit machine. I
>> suppose this should be verified on a machine that is really 32-bit.

A somewhat experimental patch 0004 is now uploaded. It adds a 32-bit
version of the intrinsics asm file generated by icc, and modifies all
sse2i targets to utilize it.

Works fine (and do give a performance boost) on linux-x86-64-32-sse2i
test target. I'd be interested to hear results from testing on Windows.

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.