[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8nP3oE4H9fUUuT5LWd_WXcriKO+NX77ZafbQYF7nCZyew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:24:01 -0400
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Owl 3.0 and Virtual Machine Setup?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:59:47AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> So I'm clear: for Openwall 3.0 (Owl-3_0-stable-20130408-x86_64), I
>> should chose a virtual machine based on Red Hat Enterprise 4? VMware
>> is offering RHEL 3, 4, 5 and 6; but RHEL 4 seems kind of odd since its
>> from 2005-2010 and Owl 3.0 is dated April 2013.
>
> Out of VMware's choices, RHEL 5 is the closest match - based on the
> kernel branch that Owl uses.
>
> Also, for your purposes Owl-current is a better choice than Owl 3.0-stable.
> (RHEL 5 is currently the correct choice in VMware for either version.)
Thanks, and forgive my ignorance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
