[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130919062230.GA12505@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:22:30 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Owl 3.0 and Virtual Machine Setup?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:59:47AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> So I'm clear: for Openwall 3.0 (Owl-3_0-stable-20130408-x86_64), I
> should chose a virtual machine based on Red Hat Enterprise 4? VMware
> is offering RHEL 3, 4, 5 and 6; but RHEL 4 seems kind of odd since its
> from 2005-2010 and Owl 3.0 is dated April 2013.
Out of VMware's choices, RHEL 5 is the closest match - based on the
kernel branch that Owl uses.
Also, for your purposes Owl-current is a better choice than Owl 3.0-stable.
(RHEL 5 is currently the correct choice in VMware for either version.)
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
