[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121218062003.GA30445@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:20:03 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Owl kickstart
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:08:31AM -0500, David Parrish wrote:
> If I can get Owl 3 working with guest additions then I'll probably add
> RPMs to give me a basic LAMP stack. All I really care about at that
> point is the versions of the running applications. Which is why I am
> wondering if a version of CentOS with close version numbers to what WE
> runs would have been a smarter strategy.
It very much depends on your specific needs, which I can't guess from
what was said so far.
Here's yet another option: install Owl 3 (or better yet - Owl-current)
into a VM, then create OpenVZ containers inside that - including
possibly cloning (e.g. with tar over ssh) your remote WebEnabled VPS
into a container like this. Note that Owl 3+ has OpenVZ support out of
the box (unlike Owl 2). WebEnabled host servers actually run Owl 3 (or
very similar).
In fact, the OpenVZ specific screenshots here:
http://www.openwall.com/Owl/screenshots
were taken from an Owl system running in a VM.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
