[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPd5SoX3HTNGx=N_3bTzTqxhnbYbamZmgH++wwvbZDs88ZL5Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:08:31 -0500
From: David Parrish <daveparrish@...il.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Owl kickstart
>
> Whether you pick Owl 2 or Owl 3, you would still be quite far from what
> WE is using, since there's no web hosting software in Owl itself - it's
> just the base system. WebEnabled has much extra software on top of Owl.
If I can get Owl 3 working with guest additions then I'll probably add
RPMs to give me a basic LAMP stack. All I really care about at that
point is the versions of the running applications. Which is why I am
wondering if a version of CentOS with close version numbers to what WE
runs would have been a smarter strategy.
>
>> Anyway, here is my work so far on the veewee template in case anyone
>> is interested. https://github.com/dmp1ce/veewee-owl2 I'll probably
>> give Owl3 a shot next.
>
> Curious. If/when you update this for Owl 3, I suggest that you use
> "settle -d" (dumb terminal mode).
I will give "settle -d" a try. Thanks for all the help!
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
