[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20020530153310.O18993@auctionwatch.ro>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 15:33:10 +0300
From: Viorel Anghel <vang@....ro>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: kernel 2.4
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Radoslaw Stachowiak wrote:
> after reading list archive i found:
> >> Userland package not yet ready to support 2.4 kernel. Is there any
> >> chance to use 2.4 kernel on Owl?
>
> >Most things appear to work in practice. Including insmod. But I'm
> >not using 2.4 kernels in production yet, nor do I recommend doing so.
>
> can anyone confirm running kernel 2.4 on -current Owl?
>
> propably ill do it very soon, but i like to know other
> opinions/suggestions. Maybe someone can provide me list of
> need-to-update-packages for 2.4 compatility?
from kernel docs, you are going to need:
Gnu C 2.7.2.3 # gcc --version
Gnu make 3.77 # make --version
binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v
util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v
modutils 2.3.18 # insmod -V
e2fsprogs 1.19 # tune2fs --version
pcmcia-cs 3.1.21 # cardmgr -V
PPP 2.4.0 # pppd --version
isdn4k-utils 3.1beta7 # isdnctrl 2>&1|grep version
for modutils, i have just taken the SRPMS from redhat 7.2/7.3 and rebuild it. i
also build a 2.4.18, but haven't time to reboot with it ;-)
> I have to use 2.4 due to netfilter.
and of course, iptables.
> after digging in archives it was quite suprising for me that most
> 2.4-upgrade reasons were filesystem issues.
>
> For me Owl, with its security, is perfect match for firewall/router which
> extremly needs flexible statefull firewalling code (netfilter) instead
> old and feature lacking ipchains.
>
> --
> radoslaw.stachowiak.........................................http://alter.pl/
--
___
<o-o> Viorel ANGHEL <vang @ lug.ro>
[`-']
-"-"- In Linux We Trust.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
