[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20020530120240.GI6753@blue.alter.pl>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:02:40 +0200
From: Radoslaw Stachowiak <radek@...er.pl>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: kernel 2.4
after reading list archive i found:
>> Userland package not yet ready to support 2.4 kernel. Is there any
>> chance to use 2.4 kernel on Owl?
>Most things appear to work in practice. Including insmod. But I'm
>not using 2.4 kernels in production yet, nor do I recommend doing so.
can anyone confirm running kernel 2.4 on -current Owl?
propably ill do it very soon, but i like to know other
opinions/suggestions. Maybe someone can provide me list of
need-to-update-packages for 2.4 compatility?
I have to use 2.4 due to netfilter.
after digging in archives it was quite suprising for me that most
2.4-upgrade reasons were filesystem issues.
For me Owl, with its security, is perfect match for firewall/router which
extremly needs flexible statefull firewalling code (netfilter) instead
old and feature lacking ipchains.
--
radoslaw.stachowiak.........................................http://alter.pl/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
