[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110231141210.2626-100000@linbsd.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:53:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: <solar@...bsd.net>
To: OWL LIST <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: ext3 vs reiserfs
Lets see I think the beauty of the linux kernel is you can add anything
you want with it.
I have a ow3-hap5-sf1-linbsd-ext3 kernel patch put together
http://linbsd.net/linux/kernel/patches/v2.2/linux-2.2.19-ow3-hap5-linbsd1.patchhttp://linbsd.net/linux/kernel/patches/v2.2/linux-2.2.19-ow3-hap5-linbsd1.patch
However I dont think its Solar Designer intention to include support for
anything other than the original ow patches in OWL.
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 beldridg@...ox.com wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2001 mysiar@...pl wrote:
>
> > So maybe somebody was thinking the same about journaling FS's and an
> > spare some experience or some good thoughts. :-)))
>
> the 2.4 kernel isn't officially supported yet and ext3/reiser support in
> the 2.2 kernels isn't maintained as well.
>
> i started using reiserfs on test machines about six months ago and have
> never had a problem. i've heard that ext3 is good as well.
>
> the main reason i like reiser is that i don't have to apply kernel patches
> -> which means i don't have to remove them before applying the regular
> kernel upgrade patches.
>
>
> - brett
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
