|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0110230835130.25173-100000@rush.lo0.org> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:37:51 -0700 (PDT) From: beldridg@...ox.com To: OWL LIST <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com> Cc: beldridg@...ox.com Subject: Re: ext3 vs reiserfs On 23 Oct 2001 mysiar@...pl wrote: > So maybe somebody was thinking the same about journaling FS's and an > spare some experience or some good thoughts. :-))) the 2.4 kernel isn't officially supported yet and ext3/reiser support in the 2.2 kernels isn't maintained as well. i started using reiserfs on test machines about six months ago and have never had a problem. i've heard that ext3 is good as well. the main reason i like reiser is that i don't have to apply kernel patches -> which means i don't have to remove them before applying the regular kernel upgrade patches. - brett
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.