[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130502072359.GA4110@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 11:23:59 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: strace
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:26:01AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> I see two options, either to apply strace-4.7-i386_regs.diff proposed by
> Pavel (the patch is definitely correct and could be applied without
> additional testing), or build a snapshot from strace.git HEAD (commit
> 07f022903e077a04fefd0c6132a706b7a50a7067 at this moment).
>
> The first variant is straightforward, anybody who remembers how to use cvs
> can do it.
>
> The second variant is not as risky as it may sound because strace.git HEAD
> is quite stable now. I suppose I can manage it despite of my rusty cvs
> skills, I was going to test strace-4.8 (planned to be released in May) on
> Owl-current before the release anyway.
I think you're the one to make the determination. Thanks!
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
