[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130430232601.GB23399@altlinux.org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 03:26:01 +0400
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: strace
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:01:33PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 02:31:17AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > The morale is simple: avoid using "struct pt_regs" on i386, it may bite
> > when you expect it less.
>
> So, who is going to fix strace in Owl-current, and in what way? For
I see two options, either to apply strace-4.7-i386_regs.diff proposed by
Pavel (the patch is definitely correct and could be applied without
additional testing), or build a snapshot from strace.git HEAD (commit
07f022903e077a04fefd0c6132a706b7a50a7067 at this moment).
The first variant is straightforward, anybody who remembers how to use cvs
can do it.
The second variant is not as risky as it may sound because strace.git HEAD
is quite stable now. I suppose I can manage it despite of my rusty cvs
skills, I was going to test strace-4.8 (planned to be released in May) on
Owl-current before the release anyway.
--
ldv
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
